RonPaulians continue to play a game of "Let's see how many websites TOS we can violate!" I guess that is what desperation does.
(I also like how this 15 year old is planning on running for office in two years. Thinking he will not be made to look foolish.)
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=127393
nate895 Senior Member About:Join Date: Dec 2007Posts: 2,455
Idea to get millions of youtube hits in a few minutes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was talking with a friend and he said he posted a normal video on youtube but tagged and titled it with a bunch of "inappropriate," shall we say, references, and he got 100,000 hits in a few seconds, that is what I call mass distribution. It might hurt the campaign if the Evangelicals think that is what we do all the time though.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------"The principle for which we contend is bound to reassert itself though it may be at another time and in another form."-Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States
The time is now, Ron Paul is that form.
Candidate for 2010 18th Washington State Legislative District. Website to be setup eventually.
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue! --Barry Goldwater
Sunday, March 9, 2008
Ahhhh, those wacky Ron Paul supporters. Part 39
Desperate of what? Desperate that the man now has 4.6% support, up from 4.5%? No, seriously...what would they be desperate of? Ron Paul is not a threat to ANYTHING. EXcept a stable life for his cult followers like you. No one is desperate to keep Ron Paul down, because he does it himself. And you do it as well by pissing EVERYONE off. So why would they be panicking? Ron Paul is done. Even he has pointed out that he is not going to win. You can pathetically interpret it all you want, but he has known ALL ALONG that he was not going to be president. He does not LIKE what you do in his name. Ron Paul HATES you. For real. Trust me.
There is no revolution. There never was. All there was was a bnuch of socially inept losers annoying people and living in a dream world.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=127354
IPSecure Senior Member About:Join Date: Jan 2008Location: EarthPosts: 454
The Recent MSM Lies Regarding Dr. Paul 'Dropping Out' Is Proof They Are Desperate!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Recent MSM Lies Regarding Dr. Paul 'Dropping Out' Is Proof They Are Desperate!
They are trying to, but cannot stop the Revolution!
They are in panic mode!!!
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Is this PROOF that Obama spammers are as coordinated as Ron Paul's were?
Last night I posted a serious warning to Obama spammers that told them to remember what happened when RonPaulians spammed Digg with and endless supply of crap and then used coordinated efforts to get every one to the front page. It worked for a couple weeks, and then it got the vast majority of diggers annoyed enough to bury them as the SPAM that they were. It all snowballed from there, leading the spammers to try to cheat the system by violating Digg's TOS and creating multiple accounts, which led to those accounts becoming basically useless, and now it is impossible to get a Ron Paul story to the front page. (Thank god.)
I points out that if the Obama spammers keep it up, they could be facing the same fate as early as April...a good 6 months before the general election. Half a year of not seeing ANY Obama story on the front page. Ever.
A funny thing happened to my submission. At one point late last night (early this morning, actually) the story had at least 15 Diggs. For the hell of it, I checked the WHO DUGG THIS list and the Digg history of the people who dugg it. I was shocked to find several people with Obama in their candidates list, and who joined Digg in the last month. I couldn't believe that they were Digg up a story that was talking negatively about their actions. But I figured that maybe they were just legitimate Ron Paul supporters, and not Spammers, and therefore were as annoyed as the other 99% of Digg at the ridiculous amount of meaningless Obama stories that get railroaded to the front page.
But then I checked today. Suddenly my submission has just FIVE Diggs. Ten people who gave it a Digg last night have retracted their Digg. And I will give you 1 guess which Diggers were the ones that are no longer on the list.
And that is the hilarious part. Just like with RonPaulians several months ago, Obama spammers are now just doing a search on Obama in the upcoming queue, and blindly digg EVERY story. So, 10 people dugg my story before realizing that it was anti-Obama spam. (Not anti-Obama, but anti-SPAM for Obama.) After they realized it (or were probably told via an Obama forum that posts stories that should be dugg) they quickly came back and undugg it.
I don't know if you would call that proof, but I think it would hold up in a court of law.
I points out that if the Obama spammers keep it up, they could be facing the same fate as early as April...a good 6 months before the general election. Half a year of not seeing ANY Obama story on the front page. Ever.
A funny thing happened to my submission. At one point late last night (early this morning, actually) the story had at least 15 Diggs. For the hell of it, I checked the WHO DUGG THIS list and the Digg history of the people who dugg it. I was shocked to find several people with Obama in their candidates list, and who joined Digg in the last month. I couldn't believe that they were Digg up a story that was talking negatively about their actions. But I figured that maybe they were just legitimate Ron Paul supporters, and not Spammers, and therefore were as annoyed as the other 99% of Digg at the ridiculous amount of meaningless Obama stories that get railroaded to the front page.
But then I checked today. Suddenly my submission has just FIVE Diggs. Ten people who gave it a Digg last night have retracted their Digg. And I will give you 1 guess which Diggers were the ones that are no longer on the list.
And that is the hilarious part. Just like with RonPaulians several months ago, Obama spammers are now just doing a search on Obama in the upcoming queue, and blindly digg EVERY story. So, 10 people dugg my story before realizing that it was anti-Obama spam. (Not anti-Obama, but anti-SPAM for Obama.) After they realized it (or were probably told via an Obama forum that posts stories that should be dugg) they quickly came back and undugg it.
I don't know if you would call that proof, but I think it would hold up in a court of law.
Ahhhh, those wacky Obama supporters...
It amazes me that anyone on Digg for the past 6 months could POSSIBLY think it is a good idea to spam Digg for a candidate. It started with Ron Paul, and not the Obama spam is far worse than Ron Paul's ever wasn.
THINK about it for a second, children...what happened with Ron Paul? After a couple months of putting up with his crap, Digg got sick and tired an and correctly buried it for the SPAM that it is. Hence, it became harder and harder to make the front page. Finally the RonPaulians had to resort to creating more and more multiple accounts, thus making those accounts virtually worthless when it comes to digging something to the front page. And now, you never see a Ron Paul story on the front page.
This is already starting to happen with Obama supporters. Take a look at the early Diggs of many of the worthless Obama spam. You will find an inordinate number of accounts that were created in the last 6 weeks, and all have done nothing but digg Obama stories. Coincidence? I think not.
There are still almost 8 months away until the general election. If Obama does end up winning, do you really want to have a virtual Digg ban on all Obama stories? Get buried enough for your 20 front page stories a day and that is very well what could happen. How will that help the man?
Legitimate stories are one thing. But every time Obama takes a crap, you do not have to submit a story saying that you stuck your nose in it and it smelled like roses. Keep that up and you will see Obama backlash that will keep him from the front page ever.
Again...it is AMAZING that you are all too stupid to see that.
THINK about it for a second, children...what happened with Ron Paul? After a couple months of putting up with his crap, Digg got sick and tired an and correctly buried it for the SPAM that it is. Hence, it became harder and harder to make the front page. Finally the RonPaulians had to resort to creating more and more multiple accounts, thus making those accounts virtually worthless when it comes to digging something to the front page. And now, you never see a Ron Paul story on the front page.
This is already starting to happen with Obama supporters. Take a look at the early Diggs of many of the worthless Obama spam. You will find an inordinate number of accounts that were created in the last 6 weeks, and all have done nothing but digg Obama stories. Coincidence? I think not.
There are still almost 8 months away until the general election. If Obama does end up winning, do you really want to have a virtual Digg ban on all Obama stories? Get buried enough for your 20 front page stories a day and that is very well what could happen. How will that help the man?
Legitimate stories are one thing. But every time Obama takes a crap, you do not have to submit a story saying that you stuck your nose in it and it smelled like roses. Keep that up and you will see Obama backlash that will keep him from the front page ever.
Again...it is AMAZING that you are all too stupid to see that.
Friday, March 7, 2008
Ahhhh, those wacky Ron Paul supporters. Part 38
More desperation from RonPaulians. They have stooped so low at this point that they will never recover. Everyone Ron Paul endorses will get slaughtered if their opponents simply does what I am doing and lets the voters know the shady tactics that Ron Paul endorses. (Yes, he did not come up with this idea, but by never admonishing any of the illegal activities that his formal grassroots campaign does in his name, he is endorsing it.)
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=126880
Rhys Senior Member About:Join Date: Nov 2007Posts: 1,230
Brainstorm on how to achieve legal action against McCain and all non RP delegates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We need to do two things and I don't know how to do either:
a. form a PAC to track delegates for Ron Paul and not for Ron Paul so we can find legal reasons to replace them with RP delegates
b. attack McCain's ballots, FEC filings, anything and everything to drain his limited funds.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=126880
Rhys Senior Member About:Join Date: Nov 2007Posts: 1,230
Brainstorm on how to achieve legal action against McCain and all non RP delegates
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We need to do two things and I don't know how to do either:
a. form a PAC to track delegates for Ron Paul and not for Ron Paul so we can find legal reasons to replace them with RP delegates
b. attack McCain's ballots, FEC filings, anything and everything to drain his limited funds.
Ahhhh, those wacky Ron Paul supporters. Part 37
Once again, a ronPaulains shows the lengths of corruption they will do to subvert democracy and go against the will of the voters...
robertwerden Senior Member About:Join Date: Oct 2007Posts: 444
What happens if Delegates vote for Ron Paul at NRC?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know the state conventions have not happened yet so we really dont know what the official delegate count will be.
That being said it is more than likely the bound delegates will be slated for McCain. I know for a FACT that some of us plan on going to the NRC no matter who we have to bind our delegate vote for. I personally will tell them what ever they want to hear in order to get my self to the NRC in September. When I get there and it is time to cast my vote, it will go to Ron Paul even if im bound to someone else.
With that vote I will face the consequences of my actions. The question is what is the penalty? If my vote is in violation of party rules, can they make my vote not count?
What happens if 1191 of us crash the party and vote the same? Does this force replacement of us by an alternate delegate? Can they take our vote away from us?
I personally will face the penalty even if it is a violation of federal law to express my right to the first amendment.
Thoughts?
robertwerden Senior Member About:Join Date: Oct 2007Posts: 444
What happens if Delegates vote for Ron Paul at NRC?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know the state conventions have not happened yet so we really dont know what the official delegate count will be.
That being said it is more than likely the bound delegates will be slated for McCain. I know for a FACT that some of us plan on going to the NRC no matter who we have to bind our delegate vote for. I personally will tell them what ever they want to hear in order to get my self to the NRC in September. When I get there and it is time to cast my vote, it will go to Ron Paul even if im bound to someone else.
With that vote I will face the consequences of my actions. The question is what is the penalty? If my vote is in violation of party rules, can they make my vote not count?
What happens if 1191 of us crash the party and vote the same? Does this force replacement of us by an alternate delegate? Can they take our vote away from us?
I personally will face the penalty even if it is a violation of federal law to express my right to the first amendment.
Thoughts?
Ahhhh, those wacky Ron Paul supporters. Part 36
Yet another RonPaulian calls for violence. this time wanting the military to murder US citizens simply because they don't agreee with HIS views. This will happen soon. Only it won't be the military. It wil be a RonPaulian himself doing the murdering.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=127088
A Ron Paul Rebel Senior Member About:Join Date: Oct 2007Location: New HampshirePosts: 854
Contractually, soldiers should be jailing these fucked-up politicians!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If soldiers take an oath to 'defend their country from enemies foreign and domestic,' then shouldn't killing and jailing evil-doing politicians be legal?
By signing that contract, it should be illegal to NOT kill and jail those evil-doers that are intentionally harming our country?
Bogus politicians, this means you!MSM liers, this means you!Power-tripping law officers, this means you!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)